To accurately assess this flood risk, we developed six, state-of-the-art, cloud-based flood models; two for each area of interest. In each location, one model represented the situation in 2012, before dumping became a major issue, while the second model reflected the situation in 2019.
We also carried out an in-depth analysis of rainfall in each of the locations to determine critical storm durations and rainfall intensities. This information was then implemented into the hydraulic models.
Armed with this information, we ran a total of 28 different simulations for the three locations, pre- and post-dumping and a variety of likelihoods of occurrence to derive flood lines, water depth maps, water level difference maps, and flood hazard rating maps.
We followed this up with a quantitative flood risk assessment to provide a deeper understanding of the economic flood risk and to create insights how risk levels have changed between 2012 and 2019.
These assessments were performed with our Global Flood Risk tool – a cloud-based platform used to quickly and accurately calculate flood damage and risk.
As a result of our analysis, we were able to draw several conclusions and provide recommendations to help the City of Johannesburg to improve the model going forward.
The study found that water level increases of up to 1.8 meters could occur as a result of the illegal dumping during a 100-year flood.
We were also able to calculate and visualise an increase in economic flood risk – the expected annual direct flood damage – between 2012 and 2019. Our models showed an increase of 12-15% for Kaalfontein, 33-34% for Diepsloot, and 8-10% for Alexandra which supported the need for improved urban river management.
Contact our Climate Resilience experts!